What have we done

What have we done? What will we do?

Breckinridge

• Presentation at Principal’s meeting. • Principals share with teachers

Logan

• Discussions stage • Challenge our own assumptions by looking beyond our current culture, performance, etc.

• Change culture and school + district norms

• Be strategic and plan for these things rather than just react.

Allen

• Ordered Thinklink district wide • Scheduled ThinkLink P.D.

• Ordered FMD math software • Conduct Leadership

• Ordered Drive-Through program for O.T. meetings to discuss uses of

• Hired a full time technology technician data

• Staff meeting to discuss technology • Improve data collection

• Discuss the Rigor Relevance model to Teacher • Discuss:

Cohort 1 (New teachers to District) -DOK

• Walk-Throughs -Rigor/Relevance

To all certified employees 09/24/07 (all day P.D. for everyone)

Monroe and Metcalfe

• Distributed bell curve article to • Self-evaluation &

special ed. teachers. comparison on performance

• Framed essential questions for adm. level

around the rubric for 10 key components • Questions part of adm.

for school & district improvement evaluation

• Begin discussion of how we move from promising to proven

• Begin a conversation on what we want our schools to be evaluated.

Ohio

• Discussion district level/admin. • Scheduled Transition PD

• Download of Powerpoints for middle/high Sp. Ed. to

• Fish improve “Personalized

• School Culture Surveys Learning”

• Share with staff

• Training by staff

• Analyze for continued improvement

Simpson

• Some reflection and discussion of • Explore ways to integrate

session one concepts 21^st century skills/RRR into

mission/vision

• Build common language & shared knowledge around this framework

Russellville Ind.

• Download 1^st session Powerpoints • Imbed R&R ideas in

• Discussed qualities of R&R with faculty Friday PD Sessions

• Discussed where we are & how ideas • Disaggregate data

parallel Thoughtful Ed. with R&R in mind

• Discussed with SBDM the concept of R&R • Look more closely for high

and reasons for its absence levels of R&R in lesson plans & walk-throughs

Hart

• Met as team again • Collect, Review, Analyze

• Gave same surveys to Principals surveys

• Discussed doing “Perception Survey” • Identify strategies for action

with staff and students • Use “Rigor/Relevance” framework in Curriculum Alignment

Edmonson

• Shared Key Concepts Administrators • Grade level meetings to

• Discussed HEAT analysis document discuss the HEAT document

with Curriculum coordinators and teachers • PD for entire school year

• Planning process for P.D. (Turning up the Heat) (turning up the HEAT)

entire year • Integrate the Rigor and Relevance framework into district-wide PD

• Share with grade levels 10 key components

Daviess

• Focus groups • Continue to develop and

• Administrator PD implement plan

• Six hour staff PD

• Synthesized data from focus groups and

staff PD

• Shared results with all staff opening day

• Critical thinking with guiding questions for

walk through instrument

• Concurrent Action Plan

Bowling Green Ind.

• Discuss with administrators • Altering walk-thru template

benchmarking against Top Ten Percent in regard to student

not the “average” engagement

• Integrated 21^st century skills into interview • Best use of personal

process communication devices

Green

• Limited conversation • Evaluate our district first according to the rubric of 10 components necessary for continuous district improvement